The Foundation is not a platform for women to battle with the men who strongly value Donald Trump’s version of masculinity. Instead it offers an inquiry into alternative ideas offered by the eternal feminine and provides us access to means to systemically modify how the species interacts with its environment, and specifically nature, and then itself. Humans need to rethink nature and its role in their lives. AI development will not address the issues involved herein. It only expands on the industrial revolution ideal of machine over man. The cosmos is not impressed with human machinery.
The feminine perspective differs. It has a different attitude relative to live and the role of humans in it. The feminine attitude has been kept at bay for several centuries, with great force via the advent of the printing press and the word as written, that forgetful men rely on. Then, via the development and mythology of an industrialization revolution men declared open warfare on nature. Much of this “stems” from and gives support back to a masculine DNA.
Yes, of course there are women exhibiting an anti-feminine, masculine perspective just as there are men illustrating a feminine, non-masculine view. Thus both men and women can illustrate the considerable potential of the feminine for improving the 21st Century beyond the limitations of the masculine. This is a step towards the higher idea of “both plus more” where the more is the ideal.
The quest for the Eternal Feminine is not of the immediate, the masculine or the normal. The Feminine is not to control issues, but to manage them. The Feminine is not limited by either changelessness or timelessness as presented in the logic of Confucius, Parmenides, and Aristotle. The Feminine is instead with the flow of nature via the eternal change seen by Lao Tzu, Socrates and Heraclitus. It is consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, a rule of science virtually ignored in education.
The feminine reconnects the disconnected of the short term to see the longer term consequences of seeking short term success. She avoids Faustian Tragedies while reducing Faustian effects. In this, the feminine occupies eternity.
A symbol of the blood running through the eternal feminine is see in the model of 15th Century Joan of Arc. The masculine has long been fearful of this and continues with burning such at the stake, although in more modern ways. 
THE ETERNAL FEMININE 
The initiation of the Foundation will require the enthusiasm and talent of a spokesperson that understands and supports the Foundation mission. It should be a woman whose daily activities transcend entertainment and business as usual acceptance of the definition of the female, as carried from tradition. Such people as Ellen Page or Emma Watson would be candidates.
LikeLike
To jog the heroic in each female, you might look at two very different yet very similar women of the 20th Century West. One is Doris Lessing, the 2007 Nobel Prize Winner in Literature. Perhaps her “The Golden Notebook” provides a beginning. Implicit in her disgust with parts of the “What is.” From this revelation you may then see the light coming through the “is” to see glimpses of “The Ought To Be” as it attempts to come alive. Currently most women seek the ought to be in the university, but as Lessing counsels us: “In university they don’t tell you that the greater part of the law is learning to tolerate fools.” And then they move to realize as did Lessing, “I’m sure that everybody feels a kind of permanent anguish about what’s going on in the world.”
The second woman, Susanne K. Langer, a favoured student of Alfred North Whitehead, was fundamental to what we now call the world of information technology. Her foundation book, “Philosophy in a New Key,” illustrates her largely ignored role. Much of her articulation of the difference between sign (that which announces) and symbol (that which leads to further conceptualization of) was profound, picked up in the works of several men but no reference ever seen to “that woman.” Her Introduction to Symbolic Logic was profoundly important to early ideas of programming languages, and what they must be and do. As the Mathematics Gazette stated: “One of the clearest and simplest introductions to the subject which is very much alive….the intelligent non-mathematician should have no difficulty.”
LikeLike